#Opengl 4.5 r9 290 benchmark Patch#
So that is a surprising result, OK the 1080 was using Vulkan but considering the optimisation benefits are yet to translate to healthy boost in DX12 for NVIDIA this still looks impressive (or at least Vulkan is working better than DX12 lol), especially as the 1080FE was on the very top setting and the 980ti was a notch below and also 1080FE on beta drivers.įingers crossed pcgameshardware will repeat their test once the Vulkan patch is rolled out for a better comparison.īut looks like it should raise some eyebrows regarding initial real-world result for Founders Edition 1080, anyway better information IMO than any supposed "leaked" results popping up on the internet. Those that have taken the step to the ever popular 1440p resolution can achieve very smooth lag free performance with a Radeon R9 290 or GTX 780 Ti. In their test an AIB 980ti Palit Super Jetstream had a minimum 125 and average 158.7 - See OP chart, thanks Ieldra. Pcgameshardware has done a recent review of Doom and the results are interesting even at 1920x1080 (which was the presentations setting as well) they used the setting below nightmare so less shadow detail.
#Opengl 4.5 r9 290 benchmark drivers#
They showed Doom obviously using beta drivers with Vulkan and the game on absolute top settings (nightmare) running between 130fps to a brief peak near 190fps. All of them operate at 850MHz, but the Turbo clock functionality. Its consists of 1280 Radeon cores, 80 texture cores and 32 raster cores. It is part of the GCN (Graphics Core Next) generation and is constructed through a 28nm process. but I came across an article explaining that the Radeon R9 280 and 290 have a performance problem. Our next benchmark is LuxMark2.0, the official benchmark of SmallLuxGPU 2.0. OpenGL version string: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 18.3.6. So one real-world game performance result we have for 1080 albeit still just summary info goes back to the announcement last week. AMD Radeon R9 M290X, codenamed Neptune XT, is a high-end graphics chip, announced in early Q1 of 2014. The 290 is marginally slower than the 290X due to the lower clockspeeds and missing CUs, but minimally so.